Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCarter, Stephen
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:23.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:38:15Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:38:15Z
dc.date.issued1983-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/2222
dc.identifier.contextkey1902574
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/1515
dc.description.abstractWe live in a society that chooses with increasing frequency to leave its most difficult questions for judicial resolution. Until recently, however, the problem of how to punish a miscreant who happens to reside in the White House had never been tossed into the courts. When the President went wrong, the political system dealt with him. Presidents have gone wrong frequently. Presidents have been accused of misconduct in office for about as long as there have been Presidents. If the more recent Chief Executives sometimes seem to have been especially fond of abusing their powers, that may only be because historians, viewing the distant past through the glass of folklore, have been kind.
dc.titleThe Political Aspects of Judicial Power: Some Notes on the Presidential Immunity Decision
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:38:15Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2222
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3269&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Political_Aspects_of_Judicial_ ...
Size:
4.100Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record