Environmental Markets and Beyond: Three Modest Proposals for the Future of Environmental Law
dc.contributor.author | Elliott, E. | |
dc.date | 2021-11-25T13:34:23.000 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-26T11:38:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-26T11:38:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2001-01-01T00:00:00-08:00 | |
dc.identifier | fss_papers/2219 | |
dc.identifier.citation | E Donald Elliott, Environmental Markets and Beyond: Three Modest Proposals for the Future of Environmental Law, 29 CAP. UL REV. 245 (2001). | |
dc.identifier.contextkey | 1889699 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/1512 | |
dc.description.abstract | I offer three modest proposals for what we might do to improve environmental law in the United States in the next generation. They are: (1) increased use of nvironmental markets ("cap and trade" or bubble programs) and other incentive-based regulatory instruments; (2) retroactive application of the Chevron decision, which would help to clear out some of the policy underbrush left by overly aggressive past court decisions; and (3) increased use of information production and dissemination as a strategy to stimulate so-called "voluntary" actions to protect the environment. | |
dc.title | Environmental Markets and Beyond: Three Modest Proposals for the Future of Environmental Law | |
dc.source.journaltitle | Faculty Scholarship Series | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2021-11-26T11:38:15Z | |
dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2219 | |
dc.identifier.legacyfulltext | https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3185&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1 |