Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorElliott, E. Donald
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:23.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:38:12Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:38:12Z
dc.date.issued1989-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/2202
dc.identifier.contextkey1893883
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/1499
dc.description.abstractThe problem to be discussed is hardly the most important facing the law today. Expert testimony about technical and scientific issues is presented in a relatively small percentage of cases. It plays a central role in an even smaller proportion: for example, in toxic torts, medical malpractice, and occasionally in criminal cases in which new forensic techniques are offered as evidence.
dc.titleToward Incentive-Based Procedure: Three Approaches for Regulating Scientific Evidence
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:38:12Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2202
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3202&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Incentive_Procedure.pdf
Size:
1.611Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record