The New Sherman Act: A Positive Instrument of Progress
| dc.contributor.author | Rostow, Eugene | |
| dc.date | 2021-11-25T13:34:22.000 | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-26T11:38:05Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2021-11-26T11:38:05Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 1947-01-01T00:00:00-08:00 | |
| dc.identifier | fss_papers/2158 | |
| dc.identifier.contextkey | 1870472 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/1456 | |
| dc.description.abstract | The issue of competition and monopoly is fundamental to the development of legal machinery for the effective and progressive control of the national economy. Competition is not a cure-all for our economic ills. But measures to increase the degree of competition in the organization of economic life are important items in the tool-bag of techniques with which we can reasonably hope to control our economic destiny. The amount of competition we achieve in industrial organization will have a good deal to do with our success in reaching the basic goals of the Employment Act of 1946—high and sustained levels of productive employment in a free society. The organization of industry and commerce is a matter of central consequence to national policy in at least four basic particulars. | |
| dc.title | The New Sherman Act: A Positive Instrument of Progress | |
| dc.source.journaltitle | Faculty Scholarship Series | |
| refterms.dateFOA | 2021-11-26T11:38:05Z | |
| dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2158 | |
| dc.identifier.legacyfulltext | https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3169&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1 |
