Paying Decent Respect to International Tribunal Rulings
dc.contributor.author | Koh, Harold | |
dc.contributor.author | Weisburd, A. | |
dc.date | 2021-11-25T13:34:22.000 | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-11-26T11:37:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2021-11-26T11:37:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2002-01-01T00:00:00-08:00 | |
dc.identifier | fss_papers/2110 | |
dc.identifier.contextkey | 1785271 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/1404 | |
dc.description.abstract | Let me comment on Mark Weisburd's provocative, but fundamentally overdrawn, presentation regarding "vertical" conflicts between international and national tribunals. On the one hand, Professor Weisburd sets up and attacks a straw man-the "bindingness" of international tribunal decisions on U.S. domestic courts-a proposition for which no one is seriously arguing. Second, he waves a red herring-the potential unconstitutionality of domestic judicial decisions that choose to follow international law precedents. On closer examination, I would argue, it becomes clear that neither of these propositions is really at stake in the cases that currently vex the U.S. courts. | |
dc.title | Paying Decent Respect to International Tribunal Rulings | |
dc.source.journaltitle | Faculty Scholarship Series | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2021-11-26T11:37:56Z | |
dc.identifier.legacycoverpage | https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2110 | |
dc.identifier.legacyfulltext | https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2839&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1 |