Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKoh, Harold
dc.contributor.authorWeisburd, A.
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:22.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:37:56Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:37:56Z
dc.date.issued2002-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/2110
dc.identifier.contextkey1785271
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/1404
dc.description.abstractLet me comment on Mark Weisburd's provocative, but fundamentally overdrawn, presentation regarding "vertical" conflicts between international and national tribunals. On the one hand, Professor Weisburd sets up and attacks a straw man-the "bindingness" of international tribunal decisions on U.S. domestic courts-a proposition for which no one is seriously arguing. Second, he waves a red herring-the potential unconstitutionality of domestic judicial decisions that choose to follow international law precedents. On closer examination, I would argue, it becomes clear that neither of these propositions is really at stake in the cases that currently vex the U.S. courts.
dc.titlePaying Decent Respect to International Tribunal Rulings
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:37:56Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2110
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2839&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Decent_Respect_Tribunal.pdf
Size:
1.050Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record