Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKoh, Harold
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:22.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:37:53Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:37:53Z
dc.date.issued1994-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/2092
dc.identifier.contextkey1818987
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/1383
dc.description.abstractSix years ago, I explained in these pages Why the President (Almost) Alvays Wins in Foreign Affairs. That article identified the recurrent patterns of executive activism, congressional passivity, and judicial tolerance that push Presidents successfully to press the limits of law in foreign affairs. Four years later, in Transnational Public Law Litigation, I applauded the turn by private litigants to United States courts to promote the observance of international human rights norms by foreign and United States government officials. In the Haitian refugee litigation, the theses of these two articles collided, yet both, ironically, came true.
dc.titleThe “Haiti Paradigm” in United States Human Rights Policy
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:37:53Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2092
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2928&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
The_Haiti_Paradigm.pdf
Size:
3.164Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record