Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPost, Robert
dc.date2021-11-25T13:34:20.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T11:37:07Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T11:37:07Z
dc.date.issued2001-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierfss_papers/185
dc.identifier.contextkey1581343
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/1114
dc.description.abstractPrivacy is a value so complex, so entangled in competing and contradictory dimensions, so engorged with various and distinct meanings, that I sometimes despair whether it can be usefully addressed at all. Jeffrey Rosen's courage in eloquently addressing the subject with the sweep and vigor evident in The Unwanted Gaze is entirely admirable.' He has composed a rich and useful book, filled with perceptive observations and nuggets of sound advice. But as to capturing the core concept of privacy itself, I find myself cautious and reserved. In this brief Review Essay, I shall isolate and review three different and in some respects incompatible concepts of privacy that are each mentioned in the Prologue to The Unwanted Gaze. The first connects privacy to the creation of knowledge; the second connects privacy to dignity; and the third connects privacy to freedom. I shall argue that the first concept should not be understood as a question of privacy; that the second is a helpful way of apprehending privacy, but that it should focus our attention primarily upon forms of social structure; and that the third is best conceived as an argument for liberal limitations on government regulation.
dc.titleThree Concepts of Privacy
dc.source.journaltitleFaculty Scholarship Series
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T11:37:08Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/185
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1184&context=fss_papers&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Three_Concepts_of_Privacy.pdf
Size:
761.0Kb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record