Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWoodcock, Ramsi A.
dc.date2021-11-25T13:35:39.000
dc.date.accessioned2021-11-26T12:06:37Z
dc.date.available2021-11-26T12:06:37Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-01T00:00:00-08:00
dc.identifierylj/vol127/iss8/2
dc.identifier.contextkey14376629
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/10348
dc.description.abstractThe vast amount of product information available to consumers through online search renders most advertising obsolete as a tool for conveying product information. Advertising remains useful to firms only as a tool for persuading consumers to purchase advertised products. In the mid-twentieth century, courts applying the antitrust laws held that such persuasive advertising is anticompetitive and harmful to consumers, but the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) was unable to pursue an antitrust campaign against persuasive advertising for fear of depriving consumers of advertising's information value. Now that the information function of most advertising is obsolete, the FTC should renew its campaign against persuasive advertising by treating all advertising beyond the minimum required to ensure that product information is available to online searchers as monopolization in violation of section 2 of the Sherman Act.
dc.titleThe Obsolescence of Advertising in the Information Age
dc.source.journaltitleYale Law Journal
refterms.dateFOA2021-11-26T12:06:37Z
dc.identifier.legacycoverpagehttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/ylj/vol127/iss8/2
dc.identifier.legacyfulltexthttps://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=9304&context=ylj&unstamped=1


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
RamsiAWoodcockTheObsolesc.pdf
Size:
4.465Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record