Thumbnail Image
Publication

Counter-Cyclical Bankruptcy Law: An Efficiency Argument for Employment-Preserving Bankruptcy Rules

Liscow, Zachary
Keywords
Tax Law
Collections
Faculty Scholarship Series
Show all metadata
Files
Thumbnail Image
Liscow_Columbia.pdf
Adobe PDF, 1.44 MB
Abstract
Bankruptcy judges consider both value to creditors and harm to employees in deciding whether to liquidate or reorganize firms. This Article proposes to systematize what is currently an ad hoc trade-off by making bankruptcy law explicitly counter-cyclical- that is, placing more weight on preserving employment during times of high unemploy­ment. Although the suggestion that bankruptcy law should consider em­ployment effects runs counter to decades of economic analysis of bankruptcy law, this Article bases its analysis on the traditional law and economics efficiency norm. During times of high unemployment, significant social benefits flow from maintaining employment, as evi­denced by the hundreds of billions of dollars that the government has recently spent to maintain employment.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/4554