Thumbnail Image
Publication

Righting Research Wrongs: An Empirical Study of How U.S. Institutions Resolve Grievances Involving Human Subjects

Underhill, Kristen
Keywords
Collections
Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law, and Ethics
Show all metadata
Files
Thumbnail Image
Underhill_Preprint.pdf
Adobe PDF, 589.98 KB
Abstract
Tens of millions of people enroll in research studies in the United States every year, making human subjects research a multi-billion-dollar industry in the U.S. alone. Research carries risks: although many harms are inevitable, some also arise from errors or mistreatment by researchers, and the history of research ethics is in many ways a history of scandal. Despite regulatory efforts to remedy these abuses, injured subjects nonetheless have little recourse to U.S. courts. In the absence of tort remedies for research-related injuries, the only venue for resolving such disputes is through alternative dispute resolution (ADR)—or more commonly, internal dispute resolution (IDR) through a process offered by the research institution.
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.13051/5949